Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB
Work and play
- Display: 13 in
- Weight: 579 g
- Thickness: 5.1 mm
- Storage: 256 GB
Compare every shared field with exact values, visual meters and a clear winner for each measurable specification.
It wins 6 fields to 1, with 0 ties. This count covers listed numeric fields—not total product quality.
Work and play
Work and play
Each card names the product with the measurable advantage and the size of the gap.
Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB wins storage by 100%.
Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB wins refresh rate by 100%.
Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB wins camera resolution by 50%.
Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB wins battery by 44%.
Longer means stronger only for the stated direction. Exact values remain beside every bar.
A larger screen gives more room for media and multitasking; a smaller tablet is easier to carry.
Lower listed weight can improve handheld comfort.
A thinner body can be easier to carry and fit into a sleeve.
More listed storage leaves additional room for apps and media.
A higher maximum refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.
Resolution is only one part of photo and video quality.
Battery energy does not directly predict runtime across different processors and displays.
Move the sliders to show how much each field matters to you. The result changes instantly and stays separate from the factual field winners.
9 of 9 fields have values for both products. Descriptive fields are shown without inventing a winner.
| Specification | Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB | Google Pixel Tablet 128GB | Field winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display & design | |||
| Display sizeA larger screen gives more room for media and multitasking; a smaller tablet is easier to carry. | 13 inWinner | 10.9 in | More screen space Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB has the higher listed value. |
| Display refresh rateA higher maximum refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother. | 120 HzWinner | 60 Hz | Higher refresh rate Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB has the higher listed value. |
| Display technologyPanel type is one input to the viewing experience. | Ultra Retina XDR | LCD | No winner This field is descriptive, so no automatic winner is assigned. |
| Portability | |||
| WeightLower listed weight can improve handheld comfort. | 579 g | 493 gWinner | Lighter tablet Google Pixel Tablet 128GB has the lower listed value. |
| ThicknessA thinner body can be easier to carry and fit into a sleeve. | 5.1 mmWinner | 8.1 mm | Thinner tablet Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB has the lower listed value. |
| Memory & storage | |||
| StorageMore listed storage leaves additional room for apps and media. | 256 GBWinner | 128 GB | More storage Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB has the higher listed value. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear camera resolutionResolution is only one part of photo and video quality. | 12 MPWinner | 8 MP | Higher camera resolution Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB has the higher listed value. |
| Power | |||
| Battery energyBattery energy does not directly predict runtime across different processors and displays. | 39 WhWinner | 27 Wh | Larger battery Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB has the higher listed value. |
| Performance | |||
| ProcessorProcessor names identify the listed platform. | Apple M4 | Google Tensor G2 | No winner This field is descriptive, so no automatic winner is assigned. |
Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:
Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:
Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB wins storage by 100%.
See the full comparisonApple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB wins storage by 100%.
See the full comparisonApple iPad Pro 13-inch M4 256GB wins storage by 100%.
See the full comparisonApple iPad Pro 11-inch M4 256GB wins storage by 100%.
See the full comparisonSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 256GB wins storage by 100%.
See the full comparisonSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 256GB wins storage by 100%.
See the full comparison