ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
Sharper desk decisions
- Display: 27 in
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
- Response time: 5 ms
- Brightness: 400 nits
Compare every shared field with exact values, visual meters and a clear winner for each measurable specification.
Each product wins 3 fields, with 0 ties. Your priorities decide the better fit. This count covers listed numeric fields—not total product quality.
Sharper desk decisions
Sharper desk decisions
Each card names the product with the measurable advantage and the size of the gap.
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins usb-c power by 540%.
Gigabyte M32U wins refresh rate by 140%.
Gigabyte M32U wins response time by 80%.
Gigabyte M32U wins display by 17%.
Longer means stronger only for the stated direction. Exact values remain beside every bar.
A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.
A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.
Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.
Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.
Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.
Port count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.
Move the sliders to show how much each field matters to you. The result changes instantly and stays separate from the factual field winners.
8 of 8 fields have values for both products. Descriptive fields are shown without inventing a winner.
| Specification | ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV | Gigabyte M32U | Field winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | |||
| Display sizeA larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it. | 27 in | 31.5 inWinner | Larger workspace Gigabyte M32U has the higher listed value. |
| Peak listed brightnessHigher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms. | 400 nitsWinner | 350 nits | Higher peak brightness ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV has the higher listed value. |
| ResolutionResolution affects workspace and sharpness alongside screen size and scaling. | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | Tie Both products list the same value. |
| Panel technologyPanel labels do not capture every aspect of image quality. | IPS | IPS | Tie Both products list the same value. |
| Motion | |||
| Maximum refresh rateA higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother. | 60 Hz | 144 HzWinner | Higher refresh rate Gigabyte M32U has the higher listed value. |
| Listed response timeResponse-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications. | 5 ms | 1 msWinner | Lower response time Gigabyte M32U has the lower listed value. |
| Connectivity | |||
| USB-C power deliveryHigher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops. | 96 WWinner | 15 W | More USB-C charging power ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV has the higher listed value. |
| Listed connectivity portsPort count is useful only when the included port types match your setup. | 8Winner | 7 | More ports ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV has the higher listed value. |
Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:
Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins ports by 14%.
See the full comparisonASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins usb-c power by 9600000000000%.
See the full comparisonASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins usb-c power by 9600000000000%.
See the full comparisonGigabyte M32U wins usb-c power by 1500000000000%.
See the full comparisonGigabyte M32U wins usb-c power by 1500000000000%.
See the full comparisonGigabyte M32U wins usb-c power by 1500000000000%.
See the full comparison