Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Choose the right creative tool
- Resolution: 45 MP
- Weight: 746 g
- 4K frame rate: 120 fps
- Burst speed: 30 fps
Compare every shared field with exact values, visual meters and a clear winner for each measurable specification.
It wins 4 fields to 1, with 1 tie. This count covers listed numeric fields—not total product quality.
Choose the right creative tool
Choose the right creative tool
Each card names the product with the measurable advantage and the size of the gap.
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins 4k frame rate by 100%.
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins burst speed by 50%.
Fujifilm X-T5 wins weight by 25%.
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins stabilization by 21%.
Longer means stronger only for the stated direction. Exact values remain beside every bar.
More megapixels can support larger output and cropping, but do not guarantee better images.
Lower listed body weight can reduce carrying load.
A higher maximum frame rate creates more flexibility for slow motion and motion capture.
Burst specifications can depend on shutter mode, file type and autofocus settings.
Stabilization effectiveness varies with lens, motion and shooting conditions.
A second slot can support backup or overflow workflows.
Move the sliders to show how much each field matters to you. The result changes instantly and stays separate from the factual field winners.
8 of 8 fields have values for both products. Descriptive fields are shown without inventing a winner.
| Specification | Canon EOS R5 Mark II | Fujifilm X-T5 | Field winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imaging | |||
| Sensor resolutionMore megapixels can support larger output and cropping, but do not guarantee better images. | 45 MPWinner | 40.2 MP | Higher sensor resolution Canon EOS R5 Mark II has the higher listed value. |
| Listed in-body stabilizationStabilization effectiveness varies with lens, motion and shooting conditions. | 8.5 stopsWinner | 7 stops | Higher stabilization rating Canon EOS R5 Mark II has the higher listed value. |
| Sensor typeSensor format and design affect handling, lenses and imaging characteristics. | Full-frame stacked CMOS | APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR | No winner This field is descriptive, so no automatic winner is assigned. |
| Handling | |||
| Body weight with batteryLower listed body weight can reduce carrying load. | 746 g | 557 gWinner | Lighter body Fujifilm X-T5 has the lower listed value. |
| Video | |||
| Maximum 4K frame rateA higher maximum frame rate creates more flexibility for slow motion and motion capture. | 120 fpsWinner | 60 fps | Higher 4K frame rate Canon EOS R5 Mark II has the higher listed value. |
| Performance | |||
| Maximum burst speedBurst specifications can depend on shutter mode, file type and autofocus settings. | 30 fpsWinner | 20 fps | Faster burst Canon EOS R5 Mark II has the higher listed value. |
| Storage | |||
| Memory-card slotsA second slot can support backup or overflow workflows. | 2 | 2 | Tie Both products list the same value. |
| System | |||
| Lens mountLens-system compatibility is a major long-term buying consideration. | Canon RF | Fujifilm X | No winner This field is descriptive, so no automatic winner is assigned. |
Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:
Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins burst speed by 200%.
See the full comparisonCanon EOS R5 Mark II wins burst speed by 200%.
See the full comparisonSony Alpha 9 III wins burst speed by 300%.
See the full comparisonFujifilm X-T5 wins stabilization by 700000000000%.
See the full comparisonCanon EOS R6 Mark II wins burst speed by 100%.
See the full comparisonFujifilm X-T5 wins stabilization by 700000000000%.
See the full comparison