Monitors comparison

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE vs Gigabyte M32U

Compare every shared field with exact values, visual meters and a clear winner for each measurable specification.

Gigabyte M32U

Gigabyte M32U leads the measurable fields

It wins 3 fields to 2, with 1 tie. This count covers listed numeric fields—not total product quality.

2Dell winsTO3Gigabyte wins1ties

MonitorsProduct A

Dell

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

Sharper desk decisions

Display: 27 in
Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Response time: 5 ms
Brightness: 400 nits

Buy now at Amazon

MonitorsProduct B

Gigabyte

Gigabyte M32U

Sharper desk decisions

Display: 31.5 in
Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Response time: 1 ms
Brightness: 350 nits

Buy now at Amazon

At a glance

Four differences most likely to change the choice.

Each card names the product with the measurable advantage and the size of the gap.

More USB-C charging power

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE wins usb-c power by 500%.

Higher refresh rate

Gigabyte M32U

Gigabyte M32U wins refresh rate by 140%.

Lower response time

Gigabyte M32U

Gigabyte M32U wins response time by 80%.

Larger workspace

Gigabyte M32U

Gigabyte M32U wins display by 17%.

Field comparison

Read every measurable field as a meter.

Longer means stronger only for the stated direction. Exact values remain beside every bar.

Display size

A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.

Higher wins

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

27 in

Gigabyte M32U

31.5 in

Field winner Larger workspaceGigabyte M32U

Maximum refresh rate

A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.

Higher wins

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

60 Hz

Gigabyte M32U

144 Hz

Field winner Higher refresh rateGigabyte M32U

Listed response time

Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.

Lower wins

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

5 ms

Gigabyte M32U

1 ms

Field winner Lower response timeGigabyte M32U

Peak listed brightness

Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.

Higher wins

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

400 nits

Gigabyte M32U

350 nits

Field winner Higher peak brightnessDell UltraSharp U2723QE

USB-C power delivery

Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.

Higher wins

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

90 W

Gigabyte M32U

15 W

Field winner More USB-C charging powerDell UltraSharp U2723QE

Listed connectivity ports

Port count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.

Higher wins

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

Gigabyte M32U

Field winner TieTie

Your Fit Meter

Make the decision personal.

Move the sliders to show how much each field matters to you. The result changes instantly and stays separate from the factual field winners.

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE50/100

Gigabyte M32U50/100

Adjust the sliders to calculate your fit.

Display6/10

A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.

Refresh rate6/10

A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.

Response time6/10

Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.

Brightness4/10

Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.

USB-C power4/10

Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.

Full field comparison

Every available field, value and winner.

8 of 8 fields have values for both products. Descriptive fields are shown without inventing a winner.

Specification	Dell UltraSharp U2723QE	Gigabyte M32U	Field winner
Display
Display sizeA larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.	27 in	31.5 inWinner	Larger workspace Gigabyte M32U has the higher listed value.
Peak listed brightnessHigher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.	400 nitsWinner	350 nits	Higher peak brightness Dell UltraSharp U2723QE has the higher listed value.
ResolutionResolution affects workspace and sharpness alongside screen size and scaling.	3840 x 2160	3840 x 2160	Tie Both products list the same value.
Panel technologyPanel labels do not capture every aspect of image quality.	IPS Black	IPS	No winner This field is descriptive, so no automatic winner is assigned.
Motion
Maximum refresh rateA higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.	60 Hz	144 HzWinner	Higher refresh rate Gigabyte M32U has the higher listed value.
Listed response timeResponse-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.	5 ms	1 msWinner	Lower response time Gigabyte M32U has the lower listed value.
Connectivity
USB-C power deliveryHigher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.	90 WWinner	15 W	More USB-C charging power Dell UltraSharp U2723QE has the higher listed value.
Listed connectivity portsPort count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.	7	7	Tie Both products list the same value.

Decision summary

Choose the strengths that fit your life.

Choose product A when…

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:

Brightness: 400 nits
USB-C power: 90 W

Buy now at Amazon

Choose product B when…

Gigabyte M32U

Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:

Display: 31.5 in
Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Response time: 1 ms

Buy now at Amazon

Field wins compare listed numbers only. They do not prove overall quality, durability, comfort, camera output or real-world performance. Product configurations and availability can vary; confirm the exact Amazon listing before purchase.

Keep exploring